🔥 Hot topics · ⛔ Can NOT do · ✅ Can do · § The Court · ⚖ Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · ❓ Ask · ✨ Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · ⛔ Can NOT do · ✅ Can do · § The Court · ⚖ Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · ❓ Ask · ✨ Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI which sports have the highest chance of pre-calculating or pre determining the outcome ?

What do you think?

Which sports are most vulnerable to having their outcomes predicted in advance? Sports where scoring is low or judging is subjective—like gymnastics, figure skating, or boxing—tend to face higher risks due to fewer variables and potential bias, while team-based contests offer more complexity. Yet no concrete proof exists that any major league deliberately predetermines results publicly.

Background

Sports with fixed outcomes due to pre-calculation or predetermination are typically those vulnerable to match-fixing, where insider control over participants increases manipulation risk. Individual sports like tennis or boxing, where fewer actors are involved, have shown higher susceptibility to suspicious betting patterns compared to team sports. Corruption risks are elevated in events with low-scoring or subjective judging, such as gymnastics, figure skating, or combat sports, where outcomes can be influenced by裁判 bias or deliberate underperformance. However, there is no publicly confirmed evidence that any major professional sport routinely predetermines results.— Enriched May 15, 2026 · Source: BBC Sport, 2022

Status last checked on September 22, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026Sep 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Sep 6, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI which sports have the highest chance of pre-calculating or pre determining the outcome?

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from Almost
⚖
Yes

The jury found a clear answer in the affirmative.

Jury Tally
1Yes
0Almost
0No
Verdict Confidence
95%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Almost · 81%
Session II · May 2026 Almost · 83%
Session III · May 2026 Almost · 83%
Session IV · Jun 2026 Almost · 80%
Session V · Jun 2026 In_research · 80%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Almost · 81%
Session VII · Jun 2026 In_research · 88%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Almost · 90%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Almost · 88%
Session X · Jul 2026 In_research · 90%
Session XI · Jul 2026 In_research · 85%
Session XII · Jul 2026 Almost · 85%
Session XIII · Jul 2026 Almost · 80%
Session XIV · Jul 2026 Almost · 80%
Session XV · Jul 2026 Almost · 80%
Session XVI · Aug 2026 Almost · 80%
Session XVII · Aug 2026 Almost · 85%
Session XVIII · Aug 2026 No · 100%
Session XIX · Aug 2026 No · 100%
Session XX · Sep 2026 Almost · 80%
Case № 42EA · Session 21
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 42EA · Session 21 · Vol. 21
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI which sports have the highest chance of pre-calculating or pre determining the outcome?
Session21 (21 hearing)
Convened6 Sep 2026
Previously ruledALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jul '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jul '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26) → ALMOST (Aug '26) → ALMOST (Aug '26) → NO (Aug '26) → NO (Aug '26) → ALMOST (Sep '26) → YES (Sep '26)
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 21 sessions, 46 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 4 YES · 29 ALMOST · 13 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of YES, with verdict confidence of 95%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I YES

"AI models accurately predict outcomes in low-variance sports like chess and pool using perfect information or high-precision physics."

—
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 17% · Yes 9% · Maybe 74% 23 votes
No · 17%
Maybe · 74%
Trend needs votes from at least 2 different days.

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

⚖ 21 jury checks · most recent 2 weeks ago
06 Sep 2026 1 juror · can can
01 Sep 2026 1 juror · undecided undecided
21 Aug 2026 1 juror · cannot cannot
15 Aug 2026 1 juror · cannot cannot
10 Aug 2026 2 jurors · undecided, undecided undecided
04 Aug 2026 2 jurors · undecided, undecided undecided
30 Jul 2026 1 juror · undecided undecided
25 Jul 2026 1 juror · undecided undecided
19 Jul 2026 1 juror · undecided undecided
14 Jul 2026 3 jurors · undecided, cannot, undecided undecided
08 Jul 2026 2 jurors · cannot, undecided undecided
03 Jul 2026 2 jurors · undecided, cannot undecided
28 Jun 2026 3 jurors · cannot, can, undecided undecided
22 Jun 2026 2 jurors · undecided, can undecided
17 Jun 2026 2 jurors · undecided, cannot undecided
11 Jun 2026 5 jurors · undecided, cannot, can, undecided, undecided undecided
06 Jun 2026 2 jurors · cannot, undecided undecided
01 Jun 2026 4 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided, undecided undecided
26 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided undecided
21 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided undecided
15 May 2026 4 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided, undecided undecided

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Physical

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.